New Hampshire Tells Mike Bloomberg and Shannon Watts to go FUCK Themselves


NH is still the Live Free or Die State

I travel a lot around the country for work. But New Hampshire is my home. Mike Bloomberg and his thugs (MAIG MDM) have been causing trouble here recently.  They had a anti-gun universal background check law written by some lawyers in San Francisco.  They got some of the NH liberals to sponsor the bill.  The leader of the democratic house in NH, I think his name is Steve Shitface, or something like that, was pushing and threatening the democrats in the two committees to vote yes on this bill.  It passed through both committees.

Here’s a great article in the telling about all the lies the liberals have been spreading with this bill.

The Pro-gun crowd greatly outnumbered the anti-gun crowd at every hearing. When there was much anger, they modified the bill to please the Pro-gun crowd, and they made it worse.  Background Checks were were only for all commercial sales not private sales. Sounds great except they  then defined a commercial sale as one that took place at a gun show, as the result of being at a gun show or if you drove past a gun show.  They also defined a commercial sale as a sale as a result of placing an ad on a newspaper or anywhere online.


Nazi Co_leaders Shannon Watts and Michael Bloomberg are not welcome in NH

The liberal newspapers in the state were running articles asking for people to call their state reps and support the bill. Yesterday the Seacoast Online posted an artcile that said “Momentum is building for Background Checks.”  Well the NH house is mostly democrats. The final vote today was 2 to 1 against the stupid law.

Hey we won big today
I am sure the liberal moonbats are in shock. What happened? Well the people of NH have been drowning the NH state reps with email, faxes, and phone calls.  Supposedly it was 10 -1 against the bill.  And the November Election is coming.  Privately NH democrats are worried they are going to lose the House, and the Governor in NH and the Congress in Washington. Reality set in, they couldn’t give the voters another reason to kick them out of office.

The Backdoor way they want to use to take your guns away

Freddy’s Note:
Great Example of the way the opposition thinks.  Let’s use something that sounds good.  Insane people shouldn’t have guns.  It’s hard to argue against the concept. Except, once they have the law in place, they will re-define what constitutes as Insane. Suddenly people are losing their guns rights without a hearing, and without ever being told.  The anti-guns will say that anyone with more than 5 guns is obviously insane, or all ex-police and ex-military are suffering from post traumatic stress disorder, so they shouldn’t have guns. If you fear the government, then you must be insane. It’s not a slippery slope, it’s a steep cliff.  We must not let insane people get guns, and we must not let the insane anti-gun crowd use these laws against us.

How the Federal Government Plans to use the NSA, ObamaCare, and the APA to get your guns

From The Washington Times

In a preternatural example of tone-deafness, an administration under fire for snooping into Americans’ privacy is now proposing to waive federal privacy laws so psychiatrists can report their gun-owning patients to the government.

The Department of Health and Human Service’s “notice of proposed rule-making,” floated by the White House in a Friday media dump, would waive portions of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) to allow psychiatrists to report their patients to the FBI’s gun-ban blacklist (the NICS system) on the basis of confidential communications.

The 1968 Gun Control Act bans guns for anyone who is “adjudicated as a mental defective or … committed to a mental institution.” Unfortunately, under 2008 NICS Improvement Act, drafted by Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat, and its regulations, that “adjudication” can be made by any “other lawful authority.” This means a diagnosis by a single psychiatrist in connection with a government program.

In the case of nearly 175,000 law-abiding veterans, the “lawful authority” has been a Department of Veterans Affairs psychiatrist, who, generally, will take away a veteran’s guns by unilaterally declaring him incompetent and appointing a guardian over his financial affairs. Certainly, the findings can be appealed, but most veterans don’t have the tens of thousands of dollars to hire lawyers and psychiatrists to do so.

Although the problem hasn’t yet been as apparent in other areas, police and firemen on Social Security disability for post-traumatic stress disorder, Medicare seniors with Alzheimer’s, and people who as children were diagnosed under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act program with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder will ultimately face the same fate. Even a subsidized Obamacare policy might now make Americans participants in a federal program.